A cure is in reach for the world's most primal force of fury: THE INCREDIBLE HULK. We find scientist Bruce Banner, living in shadows, scouring the planet for an antidote. But the warmongers who dream of abusing his powers won't leave him alone, nor will his need to be with the only woman he has ever loved, Betty Ross. Upon returning to civilization, our brilliant doctor is ruthlessly pursued by The Abomination – a nightmarish beast of pure adrenaline and aggression whose powers match The Hulk's own. A fight of comic-book proportions ensues as Banner must call upon the hero within to rescue New York City from total destruction. One scientist must make an agonizing final choice – accept a peaceful life as Bruce Banner or the creature he could permanently become: THE INCREDIBLE HULK. Bruce Banner, a scientist on the run from the U.S. Government, must find a cure for the monster he turns into, whenever he loses his temper. This film is the epitome of what's wrong today in Hollywood.<br/><br/>The movie starts out great. It's different, it's interesting, it's mysterious. <br/><br/>Then, it becomes an action film, where sensitive characterization and plot development is sacrificed for CGI action sequences. <br/><br/>After seeing Iron Man, I thought Marvel was finally ready to put together some films made for fans of comic books and the hero genre. <br/><br/>A tip: If you're making a movie on a hero, try to abide by the Monomyth structure. <br/><br/>The Incredible Hulk is not a hero movie. The Femme Fatale is not a femme fatale. The road of trials is not a road of trials, it is a confused set of meaningless action scenes during which the main character undergoes zero change. The belly of the whale - normally, a part where the hero enters a strange, dark world, which represents the fact that he is lost and scared (ex: Tony Stark in the cave). He comes out reborn, and ready for his destiny. This whole thing, important in any hero myth (Batman has a bunch of them…. Achilles has one, when Priam comes to him in the night), is absent.<br/><br/>But the worst is the 'Atonement with the Father' - "The hero reconciles the tyrant and merciful aspects of the father-like authority figure to understand himself as well as this figure" - this is usually at the climax, when the hero wins/comes to terms with his past. This scene, in this film, was the stupidest thing I ever saw. You just want to regurgitate. It is senseless.<br/><br/>But that's the film. Bruce Banner's actions are inexplicable. Normally, a character changes over the course of a film. This character for no reason accepts his fate over 2 seconds as Bruce Banner suddenly realizes his role in the world. <br/><br/>For all my complaints… I realize the true problem. Bruce Banner is a horrible character. Like Peter Parker. However, Spider-man is a sentient being, and so the character develops through him. The Hulk is a wild animal, and cannot be developed. And since there is a complete disconnect between Banner and Hulk, there is no character growth. This movie was intended to be a reboot, but it comes across feeling like a direct to video sequel in terms of the story. The action luckily was a bit better. <br/><br/>The story begins with Hulk where he ended up at the end of Hulk even though this is supposed to be a new story and a different hulk. This time around though the story is lighter but still not as light heart-ed as it could be. The story follows Bruce looking for a cure to his anger management with the help of a scientist he met online while his old enemy General Thadeus Ross continues his efforts to get him by recruiting a new soldier who he has enhanced to make him better equipped to take down the hulk. The movie covers what happens if the hulk were to temporarily lose his powers and if an enemy were introduced who could match hulk (Abomination). The story was watchable without getting too weird making it easier to watch then the other Hulk movie but it still wasn't as much fun as Iron Man. That said it was watchable even if not as memorable as Iron Man. It works as its own movie but it's really more a background noise or popcorn flick. I wouldn't say it was an improvement over Hulk.. just a different kind of movie. A franchise rebooted with efficiency, energy and sporadic invention, although Hulk 2.0 hardly smashes it out of the park. The Incredible Hulk is based on a fictional character created by American comic book artists and writers Stan Lee and Jack Kirby for a Marvel Comics comic book series of the same name. The Incredible Hulk #1 first appeared in May 1962. Yes and no. Depending on how you look at it, this can be a "reboot" of the Hulk movie franchise, much like <a href="/title/tt0372784/">Batman Begins (2005)</a> (2005) was to the Batman film franchise. However, there are references to the previous film. For example, The Incredible Hulk begins in Brazil, which is where <a href="/title/tt0286716/">Hulk (2003)</a> (2003) leaves off. This is because the script that was used for The Incredible Hulk was originally supposed to be a sequel, until Marvel decided against it, and Edward Norton reworked the script to firmly establish it as a "reboot". So basically, it is a sequel in that it continues from where Hulk ended. The flashback to the character's origin is slightly different to what happened in Hulk, meaning retroactive continuity. The reason for the "reboot" hoopla seems to stem from Norton's inability to take over another actor's role without it being considered sloppy seconds or the studio's wanting to separate itself from the wrongly criticized 2003 film, thus the idea that it's the first of a series instead of a sequel. We could also look at the "new origin" as Banner actually returning after the main events of the first film so that Betty and he could try to get rid of "it", unwittingly unleashing it again, hurting Betty, with General Ross pissed more than ever after giving him another chance. While the filmmakers and cast felt that the contributions Edward Norton made to the screenplay were significant, the WGA felt differently and gave sole credit to Zak Penn. The WGA tends to favor plot and structure, rather than dialogue and character changes, much to many screenwriters' chagrin. It's also possible that Norton requested not to be credited, as he has done uncredited rewrites on quite a few of his films, most notably(1998). The opening montage of The Incredible Hulk takes place prior to the events of <a href="/title/tt1228705/">Iron Man 2 (2010)</a> (2010) . The latter half of Iron Man 2 runs concurrent to the first half of The Incredible Hulk as the news report for the aftermath of the Hulk's battle on the university campus is on the news near the end of Iron Man 2. The final scene of The Incredible Hulk takes place after the events of Iron Man 2 as Tony Stark is just joining the Avengers by the end of the second Iron Man film. The obvious. Bruce Banner / The Hulk (main character) and Emil Blonsky / The Abomination (main Villain).<br/><br/>The not-so-obvious. Tony Stark makes a cameo appearance at the end of the film to talk to General Ross about the "Avenger Initiative." Stark Industries products are all over this film as well. Nick Fury's name appears briefly during the opening credits on a government document, hinting that, like in the comic books, he is behind the Hulk task force.<br/><br/>Sequel hints. Samuel Sterns / The Leader tries to help Banner cure his condition. Sterns' transformation into the Leader begins to happen when Banner's blood drips into an open cut on Stern's forehead. His head begins to pulse and grow, setting up a sequel with The Leader as the superintelligent supervillain.<br/><br/>Allusions. (1) Captain America when Ross talks to Blonsky about the super-soldier serum that was tested in WWII and was put on ice. There is a scene that didn't make the cut where Banner goes to Antarctica to kill himself. When he attempts to shoot himself, he becomes the Hulk and smashes an iceberg—the same iceberg which is supposed to contain Captain America. (2)Doc Samson: The psychiatrist whom Banner talks to about his "problem" (i.e., the Hulk transformations). In the comics, Dr. Samson is a long-time supporting character and becomes a superhero in his own right when he attempts to cure Banner by draining out the gamma radiation that turns Bruce into the Hulk and bombards himself with it. He has a cameo. He tells General Ross that they are assembling a team, which we all know to be the Avengers. He knows about it because in Iron Man, Nick Fury visits him at the end. These links turned out to be part of a trend in the certain Marvel movies published from 2008 onward. Marvel Studios gained the rights back to Iron Man, Hulk, Captain America, Thor and Ant-Man. These characters, along with Wasp, were the classic line-up of the Avengers. Marvel Studios' plan was and is to make the individual movies (which reference each other and establish that these characters all live in the same world), then cross them over into a multi-superhero epic (<a href="/title/tt0848228/">The Avengers</a> (2012)), and has already done so for the classic members of the Avengers. In the end of the <a href="/title/tt0458339/">Captain America: The First Avenger (2011)</a> (2011), it shows that Nick Fury, director of SHIELD, already started the Avengers initiative, and the Hulk had already been recruited. In Marvel One-Shot: The Consultant, it is shown that Stark was sent by Agent Coulson of SHIELD to retrieve the Abomination from Ross for the Avengers. But, unbeknownst to both Stark and Ross, the real reason Stark was sent was because Coulson knew that Stark would irritate Ross so much that there would be no chance that Ross would give them Blonsky. Yes. In Hulk, he was 15 to 25 feet tall, becoming taller the more angry he became. In The Incredible Hulk, he will not grow over nine feet tall, which is closer to his comic book counterpart's height of seven feet. Read more here. • A whole subplot with Betty and Leonard, implying that they live together, his implication on the attack on the Hulk in the Campus, his relationship with Betty and his feelings towards Bruce Banner.<br/><br/>• Blonsky describes the Hulk to General Greller: "eight foot, fifteen hundred pounds easy… and green. Or grey, sir. Greenish grey.. It was very dark, I couldn't tell."<br/><br/>• General Greller gets angry about General Ross's "bioforce project".<br/><br/>• Banner walks along a snowy hillside where he is going to attempt suicide.<br/><br/>• Banner delivers pizza. Louis Leterrier said, "all of the footage will be on the DVD", so most likely there will not be a director's cut. According to Kevin Feige, due to positive reactions to Mark Ruffalo's Banner in The Avengers, a sequel will be made after "Avengers 2" (the working title for <a href="/title/tt2395427/">Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015)</a> (2015)). No, but there is one scene prior to the end credits that actually was meant to play after the credits. Tony Stark finds General Ross in a bar and asks for his help about a "special team [they are] putting together". Only some of them. All cinematic material made under the Marvel Studios banner, e.g., <a href="/title/tt0371746/">Iron Man (2008)</a> (2008), The Incredible Hulk (2008), <a href="/title/tt0800369/">Thor (2011)</a> (2011) and(2011), are all set in the same universe (known as the Marvel Cinematic Universe), with the characters crossing over (most notably SHIELD personnel—Fury, Coulson, Romanoff or Barton), culminating in <a href="/title/tt0848228/">The Avengers (2012)</a> (2012) which ties these films together. Marvel Studios also owns/owned The Punisher and Blade, however <a href="/title/tt0330793/">The Punisher (2004)</a> (2004), <a href="/title/tt0450314/">Punisher: War Zone (2008)</a> (2008), <a href="/title/tt0120611/">Blade (1998)</a> (1998), <a href="/title/tt0187738/">Blade II (2002)</a> (2002) and <a href="/title/tt0359013/">Blade: Trinity (2004)</a> (2004) are/were not in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU). Other Marvel-based films owned by other studios are not set in the MCU, due to differing ownership. This includes, for example: <a href="/title/tt0145487/">Spider-Man (2002)</a> (2002) and <a href="/title/tt0259324/">Ghost Rider (2007)</a> (2007) (both owned by Sony); <a href="/title/tt0120903/">X-Men (2000)</a> (2000), <a href="/title/tt0120667/">Fantastic Four (2005)</a> (2005), and <a href="/title/tt0287978/">Daredevil (2003)</a> (2003) (all owned by Fox). a5c7b9f00b Case File 45 'Fat Man Lil Boy' in hindi downloadRaimbo full movie online freeEpisode 1.1 720p torrentFreeman Velocity full movie online free3 Women, 2 Challengers, 1 Legendary Streak full movie in hindi 720pDownload hindi movie Melon SodaUnsafe Speed full movie hd 1080p download kickass movieScooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed full movie download mp4Tombstone full movie hd 1080p downloadTouch Go online free
Phylsha replied
372 weeks ago